Can Nepal Exit the FATF Gray List? A Detailed Look at Its Chances in 2025

Nepal found itself back on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) gray list in February 2025, raising concerns about its economic future. Being on this list signals deficiencies in tackling money laundering and terrorism financing—a red flag for investors and global banks. But can Nepal climb out of the gray list, and how soon? With a two-year deadline set for January 2027 and a government aiming for mid-February 2026, the stakes are high. Let’s dive into Nepal’s past success, current efforts, challenges, and what it’ll take to escape the gray list in 2025 or beyond.

What Does the FATF Gray List Mean for Nepal?

The FATF, a global watchdog, places countries on its gray list when they fail to meet anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) standards. For Nepal, landing on this list in February 2025—announced at the FATF’s Paris plenary—highlighted gaps like weak oversight of banks, cooperatives, and real estate, plus lax enforcement against illegal money transfers like hundi. The consequences? Higher borrowing costs, hesitant foreign investors, and a hit to Nepal’s international reputation. It’s not a blacklist (like North Korea or Iran face), but it’s a warning—and a call to action.

Nepal’s been here before. From 2008 to 2014, it was gray-listed but exited after strengthening its AML laws. As of March 22, 2025, history offers hope, but the clock is ticking.

Nepal’s Roadmap: The FATF Action Plan

The FATF handed Nepal a seven-point action plan with a deadline of January 2027. Key tasks include:

1. Risk-Based Supervision: Tightening oversight of financial sectors—banks, cooperatives, casinos, and real estate—to spot and stop illicit flows.
2. Cracking Down on Hundi: Shutting down informal money transfer networks, a long-standing issue in Nepal’s cash-heavy economy.
3. Boosting Investigations: Ramping up probes and prosecutions of money laundering and terrorism financing cases.
4. International Cooperation: Streamlining mutual legal assistance to track cross-border crimes.
5. Asset Recovery: Improving mechanisms to seize and confiscate illegal funds.
6. Financial Intelligence: Enhancing Nepal’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to analyze and share data effectively.
7. Legal Upgrades: Ensuring laws align with FATF’s 40 Recommendations.

Finance Minister Bishnu Paudel has set an ambitious goal: exit by February 2026, a year ahead of schedule. Nepal’s already making moves, like adopting KYC (Know Your Customer) software and prioritizing high-profile cases, as noted by Suman Dahal from the Department of Money Laundering Investigation.

Can Nepal Do It? Lessons from History

Nepal’s not new to this game. Between 2008 and 2014, it tackled similar FATF demands—amending its Anti-Money Laundering Act, setting up the FIU, and proving compliance during an on-site visit. By February 2014, it was off the list. Other countries offer blueprints too. The Philippines exited in February 2025 after four years, thanks to laws curbing casino laundering and a verified enforcement boost. Cambodia and Morocco also left in 2023, showing small economies can succeed with focus.

Nepal’s 2025 efforts echo this. The government’s drafting new regulations, training officials, and collaborating with Asia-Pacific FATF members. An October 2024 pre-listing report showed progress—like better FIU data-sharing—that the FATF praised, even if it wasn’t enough to avoid the gray list. Regular reviews every three months give Nepal chances to prove itself, potentially speeding up its exit.

The Challenges Holding Nepal Back

It’s not all smooth sailing. Nepal faces hurdles that could derail its gray list escape:

• Weak Enforcement: Historically, Nepal’s struggled to turn laws into action. Corruption and slow courts have hampered prosecutions.
• Unregulated Sectors: Cooperatives (with over $8 billion in assets) and real estate are laundering hotspots, yet oversight lags.
• Political Instability: Frequent government changes—like three prime ministers in two years—disrupt long-term reforms.
• Resource Crunch: Training staff and upgrading tech need funding, which Nepal, with its 2025 GDP growth at a shaky 4.5%, may struggle to provide.

The economic stakes are real. The gray list could cut FDI by 10-15%, per World Bank estimates, and raise transaction costs for remittances—Nepal’s $10 billion lifeline. Delays could deepen these wounds.

What It’ll Take to Exit by 2026

Nepal can pull this off, but it needs:

1. Swift Legislation: Fast-tracking AML/CFT laws and plugging loopholes in cooperative and casino rules.
2. Visible Results: High-profile convictions—like nabbing hundi kingpins—would signal intent to the FATF.
3. Global Support: Technical aid from allies like India or the US, who’ve backed Nepal’s FIU upgrades, could accelerate progress.
4. Public Buy-In: Educating citizens and businesses about compliance to root out informal systems.

An on-site FATF visit, likely in late 2025 or early 2026, will be the final test. If Nepal shows “substantial progress”—as the Philippines did—it could exit early.

Conclusion: Nepal’s Gray List Fate in 2025

Can Nepal exit the FATF gray list? Absolutely—it’s done it before, and the framework’s in place. As of March 2025, the government’s on the right track with its action plan, but success hinges on execution. If Nepal turns promises into prosecutions and oversight into outcomes, it could be off the list by mid-2026—or even sooner. History says yes, but the clock’s ticking, and the world’s watching.

What do you think—will Nepal beat the odds? Share your thoughts below and stay tuned for updates on this high-stakes journey!

---